Live Help Offline - 9am 9pm PST daily - Click to leave message 1.888.777.4443 Closed - 9am 9pm PST daily

: BLOGS

airborne

Decrease text size

Increase text size

State Courts Declare Open-Season on Veterans’ Disability Compensation

airborne

November 23, 2007

Update 2/16/09

Finally some states are protecting veterans from blood suckers.

Today Iowa State Legislators unanimously approved a Bill that will enhance Federal statutes designed to protect veterans’ disability compensation from attachment in divorce settlements.

Quote from Operation Fire For Effect

"Veterans’ service-connected disability compensation is intended to financially compensate a military veteran disabled in the line of duty. This compensation is not an asset, or property, and should not be used to calculate a veteran’s net worth. Disability compensation is awarded to a veteran that has lost some/all physical or mental ability to work, or maintain a daily routine. Veteran’s disability compensation is tax exempt and not classified as ‘income’ by the IRS. VA disability compensation is non-transferable and cannot be awarded to a third party under any legal process whatsoever. Even after the veteran has deposited these funds into their personal bank account they are federally protected from attachment or seizure. Disability compensation belongs solely to the disabled veteran that has suffered the disability."

 

 


In February of this year, Murphy was sentenced to 90 days for refusing to use his combat related VA disability compensation and Social Security Disability money to pay court ordered alimony. Circuit Court Judge, James M. Batzer sentenced Murphy to 90 days in the Manistee County Jail on contempt of court charges. Murphy was lead away from the court house in handcuffs like a common criminal. This appears to be against the law:

United States Code, Title 38, section 5301(a), which reads in part; ‘Payments of benefits due or to become due under any law administered by the Secretary shall not be assignable except to the extent specifically authorized by law, and such payments made to, or on account of, a beneficiary shall be exempt from taxation, shall be exempt from the claim of creditors, and shall not be liable to attachment, levy, or seizure by or under any legal or equitable process whatever, either before or after receipt by the beneficiary’.

Self-serving attorneys and judges have found ways to circumvent federal laws that prohibit third party awards of veteran’s benefits.

by Jere Beery
National Public Relations Director
Operation Firing For Effect

Last Friday, November 17, 2007, Vietnam combat disabled veteran Calvin Murphy was ordered by Michigan Circuit Court Judge, James Batzer to pay his ex-spouse $800 a month until she remarries from his disability compensation, and Murphy was also ordered to pay his ex-wife’s attorney fees amounting to an additional $3000. According to sworn testimony from the former Mrs. Murphy, she could no longer live with Mr. Murphy and his combat-induced Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. She simply did not want to live with him any more.

There were no claims of spousal abuse or infidelity made by Mrs. Murphy, and the Murphy’s have no minor children. At one point, attorney Connie Krusniak argued that Mrs. Murphy has suffered from Mr. Murphy’s PTSD bouts just as much as her husband has, and therefore she was entitle to a portion of Mr. Murphy’s VA disability compensation. Mr. Calvin Murphy was accused in open court of ‘romanticizing’ his combat military service in an attempt to avoid paying alimony. At another point in the testimony, Mr. Murphy’s attorney, Wendy Divozzo provided the court with certified receipts showing that Mrs. Murphy had a gambling habit and she had lost over $24,000 at one local casino since the Murphy’s had been separated.

Judge Batzer refused to accept the argument that Mr. Murphy’s VA disability compensation was protected by federal statue and he ordered Mr. Murphy to pay or go to jail. Calvin Murphy is appealing the decision. However, to avoid being jailed in the meantime, Murphy has to pay the court order until his Appeal is heard. So, even if he wins his Appeal in the future, he loses a great deal of his earned veteran’s disability benefits now.

COMMENTS

+ Add Comments

Bridget R.

March 6, 2009

It is about time that regulations are passed to protect veteran’s compensation from divorce proceedings. There is no reason that a veteran should have to pay their ex-spouse money out of this specific fund every month because they merely want their money. It is just wrong in my opinion. These veterans have sacrificed enough while serving and protecting this nation. I think that veterans should have a lot more benefits to tell you the truth. They should all be granted a stress free retirement in a relaxing community with out ever having to worry about finances. If you are a veteran who is approaching retirement age and you are looking to relocate. Then consider hiring a credible and qualified moving company to assist you with this move. It will remove a lot of stress and make the move a lot faster for you so that you can speed up the process of beginning your highly deserved retirement.

rafael M.

February 27, 2009

My first question to people like Judge Blatzer is; "Are you a Veteran?" Next, "Are you a DAV?" I asked these questions when I (as a Prioity One 100% S-C Vietnam-Era DAV) was denied a "so-called" Gauranteed job at the Spokane, WA VAMC as a R.N. (Highly qualified) The ans. I got from the [then] Asst. Director was; "That's not important." Bulls--t! What kind of a system do we have where some "Sit on a Bench and Judge" can award Mr. Murphy's ex-wife ANYTHING? Did she serve her Country? Was she Disabled? This kind of crap HAS to stop. By the way, the Asst Director was moved to Montana and Promoted to Director of a VAMC there. That, after I complained to the OPM and the EEOC. Me (and my wife-God Bless her) got-HOMELESS. God Bless Mr. Murphy and if there is any way I can help please give him my e-mail address. DAVs need to finally get together and help each other with more than "lipservice". Thank you. Rafa

stephen S.

December 2, 2008

This is just another judge doing what he personally believes and not following the law of the land. Maybe the judge is a frustrated wanna-be.

William H.

November 15, 2008

Judges overstepping. A veteran's observation.
=
How can state court judges waive away disability rights, and arbitrarily award as alimony a portion of a veteran’s disability rated compensation, determined on a case-by-case basis of a veteran’s whose disability rating that maybe, is factored in as critical? Judgment as if all disabilities are exactly the same? Overstepping those whose authority it belongs, in the practice of medicine, reevaluation, and rehabilitation of the veteran. And in doing so, violating “Authority for schedule for rating disabilities.” 38 USC 1155, "..., in no event shall such a readjustment in the rating schedule cause a veteran's disability rating in effect on the effective date of the readjustment to be reduced unless an improvement in the veteran's disability is shown to have occurred.” The courts violating as well, 38 USC 5301, 42 USC 1408.

I don’t believe 1155 argument has ever been tried, or introduced in court. Now is the time to test this. Once introduced, the court will have to deal and rule on this. If there are any upcoming veterans' court divorce proceedings, or even possibly pending cases, the introduction of 1155 could possibly be the one thing that will challenge and remove, hopefully forever, another burden from our disabled veterans, at an unfortunate time in their lives. I hope you found this advice worthwhile. Please post this notice on your bulletin board, email, or newsletter, there may be a veteran that can benefit from this advice Thank you.

Jesse W.

November 11, 2008

There are many cases such as this out there. I am living proof. The state of Florida garnishes my Retirement pay and Disability pay. The ex gets over $12k of money I worked hard for. Yes we were married over 10 years, just barely but she has been collecting money via the state much longer than we were married. I am told that no matter where I live that Florida can and will garnish my federal funds. It is something that is called Venue and until she dies, re marries or moves to another state there is nothing that can be done. I have tried, nearly ended up in jail and spent nearly 30k in legal fees to keep on paying. If any one knows a legal way to change this setup I am willing to try it.

1 2 — Next » Last »

Corporate Sponsors

Real Estate Investment Advisory Council

Tell-a-Friend About NVF

Tell - A - Friend

Employment Center

More Info...